And also link re a review on tiso full ceramic jockey wheels these have a similar full ceramic bearing to nfi but one that has no shield whatsoever tiso are very good but i believe not quite as good as nfi.
Tiso ceramic jockey wheels.
Ceramicspeed ceramic pulley wheels offers smooth and precise shifting and less drag.
The silicon nitride used to make ceramic bearings combines a set of material properties that makes it perfect for bicycle bearings.
At 200 the italian made derailleur jockey wheels from tiso might be the tiniest expensive component on our writer s new bike.
I have been testing tiso myself for years and nfi nfi is better the bearings are noticeably smoother from new i am.
Bart is an absolute pleasure to deal with.
Recently purchased bb86 pressfit bottom bracket for shimano dura ace full ceramic derailleur jockey wheels from bart at c bear.
The results showed the shimano acera as the least efficient pulley of the group consuming 1 370 watts set.
But they are more aerodynamic.
Coated version for even longer lifetime.
The results are as follows.
The problem is that they re heavier than the ceramic ones.
Our pulley wheels are compatible with sram shimano and campagnolo.
All models were tested as a set of two pulleys typically one upper and one lower pulley.
Based on the data the ceramicspeed pulley is the most efficient pulley consuming 0 033 watts set.
But can the ceramic bearings equipped rollers actually add a.
Tacx jockey wheels long term review duration.
At kogel bearings we believe ceramic bearings set the gold standard for your bicycle bottom bracket derailleur pulleys and wheel bearings.
We compared the results on the used pulleys with the results on a new full ceramic bearing tiso jockey wheel.
Tiso full ceramic titanium jockey wheel wonchoe.
I d probably use the 229 99 jockey wheels for time trials only and switch out to the lighter 200 00 ones for climbing.
Tiso makes titanium ceramic jockey wheels too.
Super low friction no creaking from bottom bracket.
19 models of derailleur pulleys were tested for efficiency.
They re 229 99 so they re probably better.
It s a tough call.